<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>QJM - current issue</title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>QJM - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2393</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>QJM</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1460-2725</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/601?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/619?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/649?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/669?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/601?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this month's QJM]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/601?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bannon, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this month's QJM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>601</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[390 days, 7 hours, 9 minutes and counting ...]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bannon, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[390 days, 7 hours, 9 minutes and counting ...]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>603</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/605?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DXA scanning in clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/605?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is recognized as the reference method to measure bone mineral density (BMD) with acceptable accuracy errors and good precision and reproducibility. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established DXA as the best densitometric technique for assessing BMD in postmenopausal women and based the definitions of osteopenia and osteoporosis on its results. DXA allows accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, estimation of fracture risk and monitoring of patients undergoing treatment. However, when DXA studies are performed incorrectly, it can lead to major mistakes in diagnosis and therapy. This article reviews the fundamentals of positioning, scan analysis and interpretation of DXA in clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Maghraoui, A., Roux, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DXA scanning in clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>605</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/619?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of combined urea and creatinine clearance and prediction equations as measures of residual renal function when GFR is low]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/619?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> UK, US and European guidelines recommend the decision to initiate dialysis should be based on a combination of measurements of kidney function, nutritional status and clinical symptoms. Such recommendations assume an accurate and reproducible measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Prospective study of 97 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and serum creatinine &gt;200 &micro;mol/l (2.26 mg/dl) who between them contributed 388 24 h urine collections. Our main outcome measure was the number of patients with low residual renal function identified by different tests, using widely accepted thresholds. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and receiver operating characteristic curves for each comparison using a combined urea and creatinine clearance of &lt;15 ml/min to indicate the likely presence of end stage renal disease (CKD stage 5).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy five patients had a combined urea and creatinine clearance &lt;15 ml/min during the study. Using the highest measurement of serum creatinine for each patient, the best of the prediction equations was the 4-variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation (area under ROC curve 0.93). This was followed by Kt/V (AUC 0.91) and Cockroft Gault with and without correction for ideal body weight (AUC 0.89). Further analyses showed that the 4-variable MDRD equation had higher NPV (64%) but lower PPV (89%) than the other tests (NPV 40&ndash;49%, PPV 92&ndash;100%), for identifying patients whose combined clearance was &lt;15 ml/min.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The 4-variable MDRD formula is currently the best available prediction equation for GFR, but will nevertheless over estimate residual renal function when this is significantly impaired in up to 36% cases. Collection of 24 h urine samples may still have a role in the assessment of patients with stages 4 and 5 CKD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almond, A., Siddiqui, S., Robertson, S., Norrie, J., Isles, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of combined urea and creatinine clearance and prediction equations as measures of residual renal function when GFR is low]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>624</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>619</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Information sheets for clinical research are becoming increasingly complex but the extent to which they are understood is uncertain.</p>
<p><b>Aims:</b> To assess, as our primary outcome, recall by healthy volunteers of key facts in a patient information sheet in a phase 3 clinical trial. As secondary outcomes, we examined whether there was a difference between medical student and non-medically trained volunteers.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Questionnaire to determine recall by healthy volunteers of informed consent information.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Eighty-two healthy volunteers participating in a capsule endoscopy study were given a 13 page written information sheet and allowed to asked questions. After indicating they were ready to give consent they were asked to complete a 6-item questionnaire covering the identity and adverse effects of trial treatments and of the procedure, the duration of the trial and value of the inconvenience allowance.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> All 82 healthy volunteers were questioned. Of the volunteers, 74 (90%) had university level education and 49 (60%) were clinical medical students. However, only 10 subjects (12%) could name the three trial drugs. The maximum number of risks remembered was 6 (<I>n</I> = 2) of 23. Only 14 (17%) could name three or more potential risks of the medication they might be exposed to, whilst 17 (20%) could identify none. Most subjects (77/82, 90%) identified capsule endoscopy as the trial procedure and impaction/obstruction as its main risk (52/82, 64%). All but one subject (98.8%) could recall the exact value of the inconvenience payment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> A comprehensive information sheet resulted in limited recall of trial risks. Shorter information sheets with a test and feedback session should be trialled so that informed consent becomes valid informed consent.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fortun, P., West, J., Chalkley, L., Shonde, A., Hawkey, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>629</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/631?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A decision analysis model for diagnostic strategies using DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis in at risk populations]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/631?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> New techniques for diagnosing hereditary haemochromatosis (HHC) have become available alongside traditional tests such as liver biopsy and serum iron studies.</p>
<p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate DNA tests in people suspected of having haemochromatosis at clinical presentation compared to liver biopsy, and in family members of those diagnosed with haemochromatosis compared to phenotypic iron studies in UK.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Decision analytic models were constructed to compare the costs and consequences of the diagnostic strategies for a hypothetical cohort of people with suspected haemochromatosis. For each strategy, the number of cases of haemochromatosis identified and treated and the resources used were estimated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> For diagnostic strategies in people suspected clinically of having haemochromatosis, the DNA strategy is cost saving compared to liver biopsy (cost saved per case detected, &pound;123) and continues to be so across all ranges of parameters. For family testing, the DNA strategy is cost saving for the offspring of the proband but not for siblings. If the DNA test cost were to reduce by 40% to &pound;60 or, if in the phenotypic model, those with initially normal iron indices were retested twice instead of once, the DNA strategy would be the cheaper one.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Diagnostic strategies involving DNA testing are likely to be cost saving in clinical cases with iron overload and in the offspring of index cases. This study supports the UK guideline recommendations for the use of DNA testing in UK.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper, K., Bryant, J., Picot, J., Clegg, A., Roderick, P.R., Rosenberg, W.M., Patch, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A decision analysis model for diagnostic strategies using DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis in at risk populations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>641</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>631</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient flow from critical care to renal services: a year-long survey in a critical care network]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The NSF for Renal Services stresses the importance of collaboration between renal services and critical care networks in managing patients with acute renal failure in the most clinically appropriate setting. Anecdotal evidence in our region suggested that some patients were remaining on critical care inappropriately because of a lack of capacity for step-down care in local renal units.</p>
<p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the number of extra days patients spend on critical care receiving single-organ renal support before transfer to a renal unit.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Prospective, multi-centre, service evaluation.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Prospective data were collected over a one-year period by either daily telephone calls or bedside review. Follow-up data were retrieved from electronic and patient records.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Five hundred and forty-two patients received renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critical care. With 68 (12.5%) patients already receiving RRT for end-stage renal failure, this gave an incidence of new RRT on critical care of 234 per million population per year. The median duration of RRT on critical care was 4 days (range 1&ndash;30). One hundred and twenty-seven patients (23%) were discharged from critical care still requiring RRT. A period of single-organ renal support (median 2 days, range 1&ndash;8) was provided to 74 of these patients (58%) using 113 critical care bed days.</p>
<p><b>Discussion:</b> Over half of patients receiving RRT on discharge from critical care in our network received a short period of single-organ renal support before step-down. This may represent either delayed discharge from critical care or a potential opportunity for care in an alternative high-dependency facility.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, S.E., Baudouin, S.V., Kaudeer, N., Shrestha, S., Malone, J., Burn, L., Kanagasundaram, N.S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient flow from critical care to renal services: a year-long survey in a critical care network]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>648</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/649?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Falciparum malaria as a cause of fever in adult travellers returning to the United Kingdom: observational study of risk by geographical area]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/649?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The probability that a returned traveller with a history of fever has malaria is likely to vary by geographical area, but this has not been quantified in travellers.</p>
<p><b>Aim:</b> To collect data on prevalence of malaria in outpatients returning with a fever or history of fever from malaria-endemic countries, at the point of presentation for a malaria test.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Observational retrospective study. Consecutive patients presenting to an unselected &lsquo;walk-in&rsquo; clinic for returned travellers.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Of 2867 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 337 (11.8%) had malaria, 89.5% originating in sub-Saharan Africa. Of travellers returning from sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa with fever/history of fever, 291/1497 had malaria (19.4%, 95% CI 17&ndash;21%). A high proportion was visiting friends and relatives. In those from other areas the proportions were: 16/707 (2.3%, 95% CI 1.5&ndash;3.8) from Indian subcontinent/Southeast Asia; 2/143 (1.4%) from Southern America; 4/129 (3.1%) from South Africa; 1/44 (2.3%) from North Africa; and 8/41 (19.5%) from Oceania. Compared to other malaria-endemic regions, African travel gave an adjusted odds ratio of 7.8 (95% CI 5.4&ndash;11.2, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001). Only 45.1% of malaria cases had a fever (&ge;37.5&deg;C) at the time of presentation. Only 3% of all diagnoses of malaria had no history of fever. In 28% of cases parasite count increased in the initial 24 h of antimalarial treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The likelihood that a patient with fever returning from Africa has malaria is high (around 1 in 5), and is significantly lower from other areas. Absence of fever at presentation does not exclude malaria.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic Fhogartaigh, C., Hughes, H., Armstrong, M., Herbert, S., McGregor, A., Ustianowski, A., Whitty, C.J.M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Falciparum malaria as a cause of fever in adult travellers returning to the United Kingdom: observational study of risk by geographical area]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>656</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>649</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modified percutaneous ethanol injection of parathyroid adenoma in primary hyperparathyroidism]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism; unlikely few patients do not meet established surgical criteria or have comorbid conditions that prohibit surgery.</p>
<p>In these subjects, medical therapy alone offers little hope for a sustained long normocalcemic period. However percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) may represent an alternative therapeutic procedure. It is currently in use for the treatment of secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, however, few studies or case reports suggest it for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. Moreover, little information is available about the long-term follow-up, where incomplete necrosis or the spreading of ethanol in the surrounding tissues is often reported. We believe that many of the side effects could be correlated to procedure itself. Taking these experiences into account, we have reasoned that in order to limit these side effects, we had to modify the standard PEI procedure.</p>
<p>We reported this preliminary experience describing our modified PEI procedure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cappelli, C., Pelizzari, G., Pirola, I., Gandossi, E., De Martino, E., Delbarba, A., Agosti, B., Agabiti Rosei, E., Castellano, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modified percutaneous ethanol injection of parathyroid adenoma in primary hyperparathyroidism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>662</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[First case of a primary osteosarcoma of the ureter: diagnostic findings, course of disease and treatment]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kemmer, H., Grass, C., Siemer, S., Stoeckle, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[First case of a primary osteosarcoma of the ureter: diagnostic findings, course of disease and treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>665</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Report/Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intravenous self administration of mercury]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie, I., Bernet, J., Beduneau, G., Auquit-Auckbur, I., Houy-Durand, E., Levesque, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intravenous self administration of mercury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>668</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical picture</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/669?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Churg-Strauss syndrome associated with montelukast therapy]]></title>
<link>http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/101/8/669?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Girszyn, N., Amiot, N., Lahaxe, L., Cuvelier, A., Courville, P., Marie, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcn055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Churg-Strauss syndrome associated with montelukast therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Association of Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>101</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>671</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>669</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>